Thursday, January 19, 2017

From Headline to Photograph, a Fake News Masterpiece


Read this article from The New York Times last week. Is the fake news phenomenon a threat to our society? How do we handle it going forward?

Your thoughtful suggestions will be worth 20 points and due Wednesday, Jan. 25, by 11 a.m.

Here is the link with photos. If you can't access it, read the story below.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/18/us/fake-news-hillary-clinton-cameron-harris.html?smid=tw-share&_r=0

From Headline to Photograph, a Fake News Masterpiece
By SCOTT SHANEJAN. 18, 2017

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — It was early fall, and Donald J. Trump, behind in the polls, seemed to be preparing a rationale in case a winner like him somehow managed to lose. “I’m afraid the election is going to be rigged, I have to be honest,” the Republican nominee told a riled-up crowd in Columbus, Ohio. He was hearing “more and more” about evidence of rigging, he added, leaving the details to his supporters’ imagination.

A few weeks later, Cameron Harris, a new college graduate with a fervent interest in Maryland Republican politics and a need for cash, sat down at the kitchen table in his apartment to fill in the details Mr. Trump had left out. In a dubious art just coming into its prime, this bogus story would be his masterpiece.

Mr. Harris started by crafting the headline: “BREAKING: ‘Tens of thousands’ of fraudulent Clinton votes found in Ohio warehouse.” It made sense, he figured, to locate this shocking discovery in the very city and state where Mr. Trump had highlighted his “rigged” meme.

“I had a theory when I sat down to write it,” recalled Mr. Harris, a 23-year-old former college quarterback and fraternity leader. “Given the severe distrust of the media among Trump supporters, anything that parroted Trump’s talking points people would click. Trump was saying ‘rigged election, rigged election.’ People were predisposed to believe Hillary Clinton could not win except by cheating.”

In a raucous election year defined by made-up stories, Mr. Harris was a home-grown, self-taught practitioner, a boutique operator with no ties to Russian spy agencies or Macedonian fabrication factories. As Mr. Trump takes office this week, the beneficiary of at least a modest electoral boost from a flood of fakery, Mr. Harris and his ersatz-news website, ChristianTimesNewspaper.com, make for an illuminating tale.

Contacted by a reporter who had discovered an electronic clue that revealed his secret authorship of ChristianTimesNewspaper.com, he was wary at first, chagrined to be unmasked.

“This topic is rather sensitive,” Mr. Harris said, noting that he was trying to build a political consulting business and needed to protect his reputation. But eventually he agreed to tell the story of his foray into fake news, a very part-time gig that he calculated paid him about $1,000 an hour in web advertising revenue. He seemed to regard his experience with a combination of guilt about having spread falsehoods and pride at doing it so skillfully.

At his kitchen table that night in September, Mr. Harris wondered: Who might have found these fraudulent Clinton ballots? So he invented “Randall Prince, a Columbus-area electrical worker.” This Everyman, a “Trump supporter whose name hinted at a sort of nobility, had entered a little-used back room at the warehouse and stumbled upon stacked boxes of ballots pre-marked for Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Harris decided.

“No one really goes in this building. It’s mainly used for short-term storage by a commercial plumber,” Prince said.
In case anyone missed the significance of the find, Mr. Harris made it plain: “What he found could allegedly be evidence of a massive operation designed to deliver Clinton the crucial swing state.”

A photograph, he thought, would help erase doubts about his yarn. With a quick Google image search for “ballot boxes,” he landed on a shot of a balding fellow standing behind black plastic boxes that helpfully had “Ballot Box” labels.
It was a photo from The Birmingham Mail, showing a British election 3,700 miles from Columbus — but no matter. In the caption, the balding Briton got a new name: “Mr. Prince, shown here, poses with his find, as election officials investigate.”

The article explained that “the Clinton campaign’s likely goal was to slip the fake ballot boxes in with the real ballot boxes when they went to official election judges on November 8th.” Then Mr. Harris added a touch of breathlessness.
This story is still developing,” he wrote, “and CTN will bring you more when we have it.”

He pushed the button and the story was launched on Sept. 30, blazing across the web like some kind of counterfeit comet. 

“Even before I posted it, I knew it would take off,” Mr. Harris recalled.

He was correct. The ballot box story, promoted by a half-dozen Facebook pages Mr. Harris had created for the purpose, flew around the web, fueled by indignant comments from people who were certain that Mrs. Clinton was going to cheat Mr. Trump of victory and who welcomed the proof. It was eventually shared with six million people, according to CrowdTangle, which tracks web audiences.

The next day, the Franklin County, Ohio, board of elections announced that it was investigating and that the fraud claims appeared to be untrue. Within days, Ohio’s secretary of state, Jon Husted, issued a statement to deny the story.

“A Christian myself, I take offense to reading such unbelievable lies from a publication alleging Christian ties,” Mr. Husted said.

There was nothing especially Christian about his efforts, Mr. Harris admits; he had simply bought the abandoned web address for $5 at ExpiredDomains.net. Within a few days, the story, which had taken him 15 minutes to concoct, had earned him about $5,000. That was a sizable share of the $22,000 an accounting statement shows he made during the presidential campaign from ads for shoes, hair gel and web design that Google had placed on his site.

He had put in perhaps half an hour a week on the fake news site, he said, for a total of about 20 hours. He would come close to a far bigger payday, one that might have turned the $5 he had spent on the Christian Times domain into more than $100,000.

The money, not the politics, was the point, he insisted. He had graduated from Davidson College in North Carolina in May, and he needed to pay his living expenses. “I spent the money on student loans, car payments and rent,” he said.

By the time he launched his fraudulent story on ballot fraud, he had found minimal success with “Hillary Clinton Blames Racism for Cincinnati Gorilla’s Death,” a reference to the sad tale of Harambe, the gorilla shot after he grabbed a little boy visiting the zoo. He had done better with “Early Morning Explosion in DC Allegedly Leaves Yet Another DNC Staffer Dead,” spinning off conspiracy theories around the earlier shooting death of a Democratic National Committee staff member.

Later, he would tell gullible readers “NYPD Looking to Press Charges Against Bill Clinton for Underage Sex Ring,” “Protesters Beat Homeless Veteran to Death in Philadelphia” and “Hillary Clinton Files for Divorce in New York Courts.” Eight of his stories would merit explicit debunking by Snopes.com, the myth-busting site, but none would top the performance of the ballot box fantasy.

President Obama thought the fake news phenomenon significant enough to mention it as a threat to democracy in his farewell speech in Chicago last week. “Increasingly,” he said, “we become so secure in our bubbles that we start accepting only information, whether it’s true or not, that fits our opinions, instead of basing our opinions on the evidence that is out there.”

That was exactly the insight on which Mr. Harris said he built his transient business: that people wanted to be fed evidence, however implausible, to support their beliefs. “At first it kind of shocked me — the response I was getting,” he said. “How easily people would believe it. It was almost like a sociological experiment,” added Mr. Harris, who majored in political science and economics.

By his account, though he voted for Mr. Trump, his early preference had been for Senator Marco Rubio. Mr. Harris said he would have been willing to promote Mrs. Clinton and smear Mr. Trump had those tactics been lucrative. But as other seekers of clicks discovered, Mr. Trump’s supporters were far more fervent than Mrs. Clinton’s.

In late October, with the inevitable end of his venture approaching, Mr. Harris sought an appraisal for the web domain that by then had vaulted into the web’s top 20,000 sites. An appraiser said that given the traffic, he could probably sell it for between $115,000 and $125,000.

But Mr. Harris made a costly mistake: He decided to wait. Days after the election, denounced for making the peddling of fake news remunerative, Google announced that it would no longer place ads on sites promoting clearly fabricated stories.
A few days later, when Mr. Harris checked his site, the ads were gone. He checked with the appraiser and was told that the domain was now essentially worthless.

All was not lost, however. He had put a pop-up on the site inviting visitors to “join the ‘Stop the Steal’ team to find out HOW Hillary plans to steal the election and what YOU can do to stop her!” and collected 24,000 email addresses. He has not yet decided what to do with them, he said.

Asked whether he felt any guilt at having spread lies about a presidential candidate, Mr. Harris grew thoughtful. But he took refuge in the notion that politics is by its nature replete with exaggerations, half-truths and outright whoppers, so he was hardly adding much to the sum total.

“Hardly anything a campaign or a candidate says is completely true,” he said.

Lately he has picked up Mr. Trump’s refrain that mainstream news organizations are themselves regular purveyors of fake news. Last week, when BuzzFeed released what it called an “explosive but unverified” dossier suggesting that Russia had planned to bribe and blackmail Mr. Trump, Mr. Harris posted on Twitter:

He did not mention his own expertise in the field.


22 comments:

  1. Fake news is almost as big of a threat to society than Donald Trump himself. With "fake news" making as big of a impact as it did during the presidential campaign the "war" between the Trump administration and the media will grow. I do believe that any credible news source that exploits Trump and his administrative staff will be labeled as "fake news". Seeing that Donald Trump is already unfit to run a country I do believe that everyone will want their opinion about him to be seen and heard. The work of the news will be more important than any other time. If we do not follow the actions of this man I do believe that he will treat, deal, and lead the country to complete disaster. Only difference is that innocent lives are are at stake. Our society is uneducated that influenced by music, tv, and what we think to be public figures/role models. It is important that we choose who to follow but also gain knowledge from wisely. But not only choosing wisely it is important that we "wake up" our peers. I strongly believe that if us millennials come together as one, educate each other, and have the urge to take back our future then that will be the day our government has no more hidden agendas, have unfit presidential candidates, or have to worry about our relationships with other countries. Our society is stronger than we realize if we would just open our eyes and see that its not our government that has the power, but the people.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe it is a threat to our society. Many people are never going to look at the facts and check sources. I believe many are not educated in order to differentiate what is real and what is not. Wither you read the first line and knew it was bogus or it took them finding out how much money he made off of telling people lies, This still is not right. Some people believe the election was rigged. It was not funny to play on what people really thought was true. Its not a joke to tell people something that already aroused fear for them. This world is way to crooked to be joking about a serious topic such as election rigging. I think going forward, we should understand that there will be consequences to people who put out fake news. If you constantly get by with a slap on the wrist you never learn what is right and wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I strongly believe that the fake news phenomenon is a threat to our society. Exploiting peoples lives with lies is just a scheme pulled off by bogus writers and until now alternative media outlets. The rise in major news organizations basing stories off unverified sources further deepens the gap in trust between the american people and those in power. The first amendment gives these men and women the right to toy with our world view and threaten our very freedom to choose. This means as we go forward we must tread carefully to avoid any falsely reported events. We need to recognize what is legitimate media and expose what is not.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The fake news phenomenon IS a threat to our society. One reason is that people have the tendency to believe whatever they read on the internet. I think that some people trust that everything posted online is true, so no one ever fact checks. This results in an abundance of ignorant people roaming the streets spreading their alternative facts. Which would lead to a large group of people uneducated and misinformed. Also to add on to that, fake news creates a divide in our society; those who know and those who do not know. In my opinion, there is nothing we can do about fake news without interfering with an individual's first amendment rights. Although, the government, someone with high influence, or an organization could be in charge of exposing different websites publishing fake news.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The fake news phenomenon is a threat to the United States. But, it is not a new threat. We have seen in history that the media is constantly abused to help one side. As an example, we can look toward the reason we entered into the Vietnam War. Lyndon B. Johnson used the Gulf of Tonkin incident to bring the United States into war with Vietnam (although, not officially). He would falsely state that the Vietnamese attacked the USS Maddox. But, would later be proven false by the Pentagon Papers. This is one such example. So, yes, false news did send us to war (which makes it a threat). It is nothing new, and is something that we will always have to contend with. The popularity of false news is at a peak, simply because people have grown wise to see it, and fake news has also grown much weaker with our evolving knowledge, common sense, and technology.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I believe fake news is not a good thing for our society to become accustomed to. It can become a bad habit for individuals and it can lead to a bad representation of our country. I find it a bit unethical that the man who wrote the article felt no shame or guilt while manipulating others. He used people to make money for himself, and I think that is not good, especially because there could be many other people that start to pick up his ideals. I think a way that we could handle false news would be to think before we act. There are many things said through media that don't really matter, so people just have to think if it is worth all the time and effort to really care about certain issues that people try to make big. I don't think that there should be laws put in place so that people can not spread false news, because it counts as freedom of speech, but I think there should be certain conditions if it leads to unethical measures. If anything there could be a law put in place for the writers to present official evidence before releasing information. Just like how many scientist have to prove their findings, I think that the people who write articles should prove what they said too.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I do believe that fake news is a major threat to our society. With so many people only attracted to headlines, the "click bait" media we live with proves that many of us aren't checking facts before we share, like, or retweet the information we are given. Though we have several, already well known fake news outlets, the popping up of these recent fake news outlets changes things. It becomes harder for the masses to determine what's real from what's fake. People like Harris who sit behind a computer screen hoping to make some money with the least amount of effort are starting to change the views of news in general for some. Going forward the only thing we really can do is watch what we share, check the facts, and research the sources. Due to freedom of speech we can not stop people from trying to make a few bucks. If we watch out for what we know or feel to be a false, we can keep them from making the few bucks and hopefully we can turn the media back around for the better.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fake news is a huge threat in our society. A lot of people are lead to believe things that they see on the internet. It's morally wrong to misinform readers because not everyone questions the validity of the news, however, people have the right to believe in whatever and the constitution allows people that power to freely share their believes. That said we can't do much to control the widespread of fake news but educate ourselves and others whenever they fall prey to lies spread by this phenomenon.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Fake news isn’t a threat to our society. The real threat is people not double checking their sources and instantly believing everything they read is true or disregarding actual facts because these “alternate facts” coincide with their beliefs. Is the media still responsible for publishing fake news? Of course they are, but we also must hold ourselves and the people responsible for double checking sources and calling fake news out. The only reason fake news would be a threat to society is if people willingly believed every bit of information put in front of them, no matter how incorrect this information may be, just because it aligns with their beliefs. It’s kind of like the platform for anti-vaxxers. There was one piece of evidence, which was later proven to be completely false, that vaccines cause Autism. They held onto this piece of information, despite it being refuted by the entire scientific community, and continue to hold onto these alternative facts. This bit of fake news has affected an entire generation of children. Many preventable disease are popping back up because of this movement caused by fake news.
        We the people, in order to form a more truthful society, must double/triple check every source that we read in order to establish what we can use for “credible” news. Not only must we check all sources, we must also hold our peers to the same standards we hold ourselves when it comes to checking sources and our superiors to an even higher standard. We also need to use our voices as the people to call out the media for any fake news they may publish, with or without the knowledge of it being fake news. If we want fake news to no longer be relevant and thriving in our society, we have to make a conscious effort to disprove and discredit piece that threatens credible news.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think this is a major problem. To many people are only caught by the headline, and even after reading work from a sketchy website, people are still gullible enough to believe it. We need to fact check everything we read off the internet. Checking your sources for credibility can dwindle the problem. However, people like Harris can be very convincing. Just because there are photos doesn't mean it wasn't staged or photo shopped. Freedom of speech is a privilege that we don't need to take for granite.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Fake news is a major problem plaguing this country. Not only is it spreading false information, but in some cases (as referenced above) it can be used to potentially sway the results of an election. There are ways to solve this however. People, before they start spreading it, need to fact check the "alternative facts" they see online. Also, random, not well known news sources shouldn't be immedietly assumed correct, they should be taken with a grain of salt, because people can easily come up with "alternate facts", especially on the internet. If people begin to be more careful about what they believe online, fake news will start to be less of a threat.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I do believe fake news is a huge threat to our society. Especially when it is dealing with something as serious as the president of the United States. Social Media is a huge part of our society. Millions of people are on social media everyday, and as the article stated, this one post (filled with lies) was shared to six million people. I do believe many people are not going to take the time out to make sure what they're reading is true. But, I feel as educated individuals moving forward we need to start making sure that we are spreading true facts. We need to use our "BS Meter" and instead of sharing everything that sounds good or right to how we think or feel. We need to research and make sure what we share is facts and not lies.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don't believe fake news is a threat to our society yet. However, if the popularity of fake news continues to grow I believe it could be. We are now living in a social media era-everyone shares everything, sometimes before they even read it! They see a catchy headline that is fake and hit the post button. Going forward, I think that schools need to be teaching better media & internet awareness, so children (and adults) can be aware that something that is on the web may not be true, and be able to identify credible sources of news and illegitimate sources of news. As for us, I think we just have to verify any sources we think are interesting news if they come from a possible "BS" site.

    ReplyDelete
  14. A fake news may quickly destroy or promote people's career. The news about allegedly falsified votes in the USA also reached Poland. Even a small, false information is able nowadays to virally spread all around the world.

    Why is it so dangerous? Because it has been already used in history as a great strategy to manipulate people. It is the simplest method to maintain power without force using.

    One of the biggest propaganda, which was based on a fake information, was created by Hitler, who used mass media for his purpose. What is more, the majority of a german nation believed him, that some nationalities have to be destroyed because of their different race or origin. Millions of people were murdered in the Holocaust. Furthermore, when some people during the World War II (for example Jan Karski) tried to tell in other countries about Jewish Holocaust, they were not believed. Hitler created so many convincing fake facts, which existed in radio, newspapers, films and photographs that people aren't able to distinguish true and false. Only if someone saw it his own eyes, could realize what big tragedy happened. I think the Nazi case is the best example, showing what may happen if we blindly trust the mass media.

    How to overcome fake news phenomenon?
    I agree with Pansy Johnson, we have to be aware of what we read and watch. We should think about information before we believe it.
    When we want to send fresh news to other people, we should compare it with different sources like Jonathan White said.
    We should be interested in our history. If we know history content it is easier find out when politicians manipulate the facts.
    What is more, we should make aware our friends, family members and children how many facts in the mass media aren't true. Only good education, consideration and conscience may protect us from fake news phenomenon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  15. During the election, I was very active on social media and in public with my views, alike many other people. I saw that many of the things circulating around the web were very bizarre and did not seem to be honest, but people would share them anyways attacking another candidate or party. I would see where people would tell these supporters that the article was “fake news” but it did not seem to sway them. Referring back to the article, it was easy for people to believe something that already aligned with their own biases, so they did not see where it could be false. Unfortunately, this only further fueled their biases, which were heavily based on false pretenses. I believe that this altered the election in a large way.

    “Fake news” is a threat to our society. People are not checking to see if the information they are reading is accurate and thus, filling their minds with falsehoods. What makes this even worse is that the new executive branch is continuing this idea by not being honest with the media and the president is calling verified news sources “fake” publicly. I am not sure what we can do to stop this trend when the commander in chief seems to be advocating for this type of information spreading to the masses. The press is doing all they can by trying to hold them accountable and give to accurate news to the public.

    ReplyDelete
  16. In my opinion, fake news is not a threat to our society. The people believing the lies they read is a threat to our society. If people would take the time to educate themselves on the true issues within their country, there wouldn't be anyone to fall for the fake news that can so easily spread. Fake news is only relevant if you believe it. In this case, Cameron Harris had every right to release this story. Cameron Harris is not the one that shared it through Facebook, emails, etc. forcing it’s spread across the U.S. Electoral ignorance is the biggest threat to our country. Most people get their opinion from social media, which typically is someone else's opinion. There is biased media reporting regardless of what political party you associate with. It’s crucial to always know your facts and why you believe in what you support. If everyone would do this, we wouldn’t have problems like these.

    ReplyDelete
  17. After reading the article, I've seen how far people will go to believe something so far-fetched to be valid. I like to stay as unbiased as possible in political matters, or in general really. This "fake" news is a threat, as well as not.

    The news being portrayed falsely can either boost a career or knock it down a peg. It's a win-lose situation for some. "Fake" news is a threat because it shows how gullible society can be. Just because the news is on the internet or a reporter states it on the news, does not make it true. When people go around, continuing to fuel the "alternative facts" and fake news, they are helping this occurrence continue and go on longer than it should.

    I agree with Megan Linton regarding how the "fake" news is non-threatening. While it is threatening to the gulible people of this world on all sorts of media, it is the responsibility of the people to make sure that what they are about to share, post, retweet or state is accurate and cited by a trustworthy source. The media and correct sources can't coddle and protect the public from what is truthful or not.

    I'm not certain as to how this can be prevented. The public has been listening to fake news for years. From propaganda to outrageous magazines found in a register line in a grocery store. It's something that has not been discontinued for some time. If anything, we need to have the public make sure that their articles and forms of media are cited correctly and accurately depict the current events in the world.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I don't think that fake news threat our society. But it is more scary that people is losing the ability to distinguish which information is true or not. As social media developed, a lot of information became more accessible to anyone who has a device to access the page. And we more likely to believe what we want. Also media tend to put the title which can make people think the way that is not true to just get attention and viewers. It is dangerous that when the fake news hurts someone. It can change someone's reputation or affect things badly.

    In my opinion, to prevent the fake news, people who controls the media should focus on informing the fact rather than gaining popularity or taking advantages with the news. They have to be neutral that is what I felt when the president election was going on last year.
    Of course, we people are responsible to have eyes to see which information is true or not.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Fake news is something we as a society must deal with. Some fake news can be considered as humor to us but harmful to others. "Fake news" must be detected by knowledge and awareness of your surroundings. Also, a major way to detect false information is keeping yourself up to date with what is going on day by day. Everyday there will be rumors spread and you, yourself must figure out what information to consume. For Example, rumors about celebrities is always a big one. From break ups, new born, deaths, etc.

    -KL

    ReplyDelete
  20. Fake news is so common in today's society that it's just an accepted fact that a large majority of "news" is actually "fake news" to lure readers in and discredit a company and or person. I think that this has to be changed, and people should know if they are actually getting correct news, or are being fed false information for someone else's benefit. I think that the best way and most obvious way to reduce the amount of fake news one reads is to pick a historically credible source. Don't just pick a news station that clearly leans left or right and is going to be blinding by that bias, but pick a source that just presents the facts and doesn't lean too far in one direction. I believe that there need to be a pretty hefty penalty for spreading clear, false news for one's personal gain (popularity, discredit someone, money, etc. Another way to make sure you're not receiving fake news is to confirm suspicious news with other sources. Don't just read it from one source and consider it correct, but challenge the information being given with another source.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Fake news is very much a threat in our society today. It has become so easy to post anything on the internet. That along with Photoshop, it is nothing to alter a story or create a article that gives false information. The worst part of it all is that people are so susceptible to believing these stories without a second glimpse or even the first thought to checking the accuracy of these stories. In ways it is scary to think anyone can post something and it can easily become viral for anyone to see, repost or send out.

    ReplyDelete